Date | Match Up | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Lead Time | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01-01-23 | Siena +1.5 v. Fairfield | 70-61 | Win | 100 | 3 h 3 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Siena has dominated the series recently vs. Fairfield, winning eight straight and sweeping the regular season series in each of the past four years, while holding the Stags to an average of just 56.3 points. Rinse and repeat on board. Siena to cover |
|||||||
12-31-22 | St. Mary's v. Santa Clara +6 | 67-64 | Win | 100 | 9 h 53 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Broncos sit atop the WCC standings at 13-3, 1-0. They are 86th in the NET rankings. The Broncos are set to play in their ninth-straight home game. SCU is 24-5 in home games dating back to the start of the 2021-22 season and are 10-1 on the year and have proven themselves to be a quality team this season. I know St.Mary's is a strong side, but nothing comes easy against Santa Clara especially at home as the above data suggests. ST MARYS-CA is 1-8 ATS in road games versus teams who are called for 17 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.ST MARYS-CA is 17-34 ATS when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. 80% or better ) after 15 or more games. SANTA CLARA is 7-0 ATS in home games off 3 or more consecutive home wins. SANTA CLARA is 3-0 against the spread versus ST MARYS-CA over the last 3 seasons. Play on Santa Clara to cover |
|||||||
12-31-22 | Idaho v. Montana OVER 138.5 | 56-67 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Montana has has produced 80 plus point offensive performances in 4 straight and Im betting they we wont be slowed here today and be the catalysts in pushing this game over the offered total. IDAHO is 18-6 OVER versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 155.2 ppg scored. IDAHO is 10-2 OVER versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing 12 or less turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 154.1 ppg scored. DAHO is 8-1 OVER when playing only their 2nd game in 8 days over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 156.8 ppg going on the board. MONTANA is 11-3 OVER when the total is 140 to 149.5 over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 148.8 ppg going on the scoreboard. Road teams against the total (IDAHO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a conference rival, in a game involving two marginal losing teams (40 to 49%)are 51-18 OVER L/5 seasons for a 74% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 148.2 ppg. Play on the OVER |
|||||||
12-31-22 | Texas A&M Corpus Christi v. Northwestern State -4 | 65-59 | Loss | -105 | 6 h 50 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Northwestern State highly under rated and deserve respect here on a short line. they have already upset TCU this season, and played tough close games vs Baylor and Texas A&M and took out Stephen F Austin as DD underdogs. Texas A&M CC was a value team at the beginning of this season, but Im betting they are getting to much respect here today. NORTHWESTERN ST is 7-1 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record this season.NORTHWESTERN ST is 11-1 ATS in all lined games this season. Play on Northwestern to cover |
|||||||
12-31-22 | Arizona v. Arizona State +6 | 69-60 | Loss | -115 | 4 h 46 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Arizona State has been one of the best defensive teams in the nation through 13 games. The Sun Devils rank 11th in the country holding opponents to just 36.7% shooting from the field. ASU has held opponents to under 60 points six times, the second most in the Pac-12 this season (UCLA, 8). Hurley's team has played in a two-possession game in six of its first 13 contests, boasting a 5-1 record. The Sun Devils are 29-14 in two possession games over the last four seasons, the most wins in the Division I during that span and deserve respect here in game that Im betting stays within a 2 possession spread. ASU enters the game having won 10 straight inside the friendly confines of Desert Financial Arena and wont go easily vs their top tier rivals today making getting points a viable option. ARIZONA is 4-13 ATS in road games after a game with 24 or more assists. ARIZONA ST is 9-1 ATS after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. Arizona State to cover |
|||||||
12-31-22 | Virginia v. Georgia Tech OVER 124.5 | 74-56 | Win | 100 | 3 h 45 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections make this total closer to 128 giving us substantial value with taking an over wager here. VIRGINIA is 8-1 OVER in a road game where the total is 120 to 129.5 over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 134.5 ppg scored. GEORGIA TECH is 6-0 OVER after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 season with a combined average of 156.6 ppg scored. CBB Home teams where the total is between 120 and 129.5 points (GEORGIA TECH) - excellent ball handling team - committing 12 or less turnovers/game, after 4 straight games committing 11 or less turnovers are 46-17 L/5 seasons for a 73% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 134.2 ppg scored. Play OVER |
|||||||
12-31-22 | Virginia v. Georgia Tech +9.5 | 74-56 | Loss | -115 | 3 h 36 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Gtech is healthy and fresh off a 10 day break and will be primed for big performance vs veteran laden Virginia who returns 5 starters from last season.The Cavs just played Wednesday vs Albany. VIRGINIA is 1-7 ATS ( as a favorite this season. Note: Virginia ranks rank 19th nationally in defensive efficiency, but have but the Cavaliers have dealt with more lapses and late closeouts than expected looking at that number. Nothing is Coming all that easy for this strong Cavs side and Im betting GTech makes them work hard again here. GEORGIA TECH is 15-3 L/18 ATS after 3 straight games committing 11 or less turnovers . Play on Georgia Tech to cover |
|||||||
12-30-22 | Chicago State +12.5 v. Ohio | 59-76 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 27 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Gillion is 13-4 ATS in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO ST. CHICAGO ST is 12-4 ATS versus teams who are called for 17 or less fouls/game over the last 2 season. CBB - Home favorites of 10 or more points (OHIO U) - team from a mid-major division 1-A conference against a team from a weak conference, off an upset win as an underdog are 7-32 L/5 seasons for a 82% conversion rate . CFB Underdogs of 10 or more points (CHICAGO ST) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a terrible team (20% or less) playing a team with a winning record are 26-8 ATS L/5 seasons for a 77% conversion rate. Chicago State to cover |
|||||||
12-30-22 | Miami-FL -3 v. Notre Dame | 76-65 | Win | 100 | 6 h 21 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. NBA Home teams where the line is +3 to -3 (NOTRE DAME) - bad pressure defensive team - forcing 12 or less turnovers/game, after 2 straight games committing 11 or less turnovers are 61-116 L/5 seasons for a go against 66% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Miami fl |
|||||||
12-30-22 | Manhattan v. St. Peter's -5 | 57-67 | Win | 100 | 2 h 53 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. ST PETERS is 6-0 ATS in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. CBB team (ST PETERS) - in a game involving two average free throw shooting teams (65-69%), cold shooting team - 4 straight games making 40% or less of their shots are 46-11 ATS L/5 seasons for a 81% conversion rate. Play on St.Peter's to cover |
|||||||
12-30-22 | North Carolina -5.5 v. Pittsburgh | 74-76 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 60 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Tar Heels are back in the Associated Press poll this week. UNC is No. 25 after being unranked in the previous three polls. |
|||||||
12-29-22 | Sam Houston State v. Utah Valley -130 | 64-80 | Win | 100 | 11 h 9 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Utah Valley Wolverines in the UCCU Center has won eight straight games. UVU has also won 12 of its last 13 games at home and 16 of their L/18. The team's last loss at home was to Grand Canyon on Feb. 10, 2022. they are also 3-0 all time vs the Sam Houston Bearkats and get the call again in a rinse and repeat situation with home court advantage being the difference maker. |
|||||||
12-29-22 | Southern Illinois v. Murray State | 63-57 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 12 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. MSU has won its last 20 at the CFSB Center dating back to a loss to Eastern Illinois in 2021 and Im betting their run stays intact when the final buzzer goes off tonight. Salukis are 0-4-1 ATS in their last 5 games vs. a team with a winning straight up record. Racers are 7-3 ATS in their last 10 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600. Play on Murray State to cover |
|||||||
12-29-22 | Binghamton +14.5 v. Cornell | 70-86 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 41 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Home favorites of 10 or more points (CORNELL) - team from a mid-major division 1-A conference against a team from a weak conference, off an upset win as an underdog are 7-32 L/5 seasons for a go against 82% conversion rate. Play on Binghamton to cover |
|||||||
12-29-22 | Rice +6.5 v. Western Kentucky | 81-78 | Win | 100 | 1 h 0 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. According to my power rankings these teams are fairly evenly matched and home court advantage does not warrant this big a spread. Especially considering how bad a FT % team the Hilltoppers ranking outside the top 300 teams in the nation. Play on Rice to cover |
|||||||
12-29-22 | Wagner -7 v. Long Island | 69-61 | Win | 100 | 4 h 26 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Wagner to cover |
|||||||
12-28-22 | UNLV v. San Jose State +5 | 72-75 | Win | 100 | 9 h 36 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. San Jose State to cover |
|||||||
12-28-22 | Xavier v. St. John's +1.5 | 84-79 | Loss | -115 | 12 h 30 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. St. John’s after a ugly effort vs Villanova last time out losing by a 78-63 count will be prepared to bounce back at home where they are a perfect 8-0 this season. Im betting St. Johns a side that has the sixth-highest Adjusted Tempo in the country (74.9 possessions per game) will come here at a blistering pace and hamper Xaviers progress at both ends of the court will be limited and the pace havoc will negatively effect a Xavier side that turns the the ball over on 19% of its possessions (117th nationally).XAVIER is 0-9 ATS off a win against a conference rival over the last 2 seasons.( Beat Seaton Hall last time out 73-70 in a grueling affair they will have them in a letdown situation in this spot play) Play on St.Johns to cover |
|||||||
12-28-22 | Rider +10 v. Georgia | 72-78 | Win | 100 | 10 h 15 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Rider has won four of its last five, with the lone setback coming on a tip-in with 3.6 seconds remaining vs. Delaware and have proven to be competitive side this season, and are more than capable of staying within the number here today vs Georgia. GEORGIA is 2-11 ATS after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. White is 3-20 ATS as a home favorite of 9.5 to 12 points in all games he has coached. Play on Rider to cover |
|||||||
12-27-22 | Northwestern State +17 v. Texas A&M | 52-64 | Win | 100 | 23 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Northwestern State last played Dec. 20 when they fell to No. 12/13 Baylor, 58-48, proving they can compete against power 5 programs. NSU held the Bears to nearly 30 points below their season average and limited Baylor to its fewest points in a game this season. Im betting Texas A&M will have their hands full in this tilt. NORTHWESTERN ST is 10-2 ATS in road games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%). NORTHWESTERN ST is 10-1 ATS in all games this season. NORTHWESTERN ST is 10-1 ATS in non-conference games this season. NORTHWESTERN ST is 7-0 ATS after playing a game as an underdog this season. Williams is 4-13 ATS versus poor shooting teams - making 42% or less of their shots as the coach of TEXAS A&M.. CBB home team (TEXAS A&M) - a good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against an average offensive team (67-74 PPG), after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less are 8-32 ATS 5 seasons for a go against 80% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Northwestern State to cover |
|||||||
12-27-22 | Jacksonville v. Notre Dame OVER 129 | 43-59 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 50 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Notre Dame has been playing soft hoops of late, even when they have a height advantage they seemed unmotivated to be as aggressive as need be. So I wont be surprised if Jacksonville gets alot of second chances in the offensive zone and score above their season average. Additionally, during their last five games, the Irish have allowed teams to shoot 71.6% from the field and 53.2% in the paint. On the flipside Jacksonville has recorded field goal percentages of 49.3% FG and 67%, at the rim . Notre Dame will push the action, because of being in desperation mode after losing 3 straight and should push past Jacksonvilles slower pace. This Im betting see a combined score that hints into the 130s or more. NOTRE DAME is 6-0 OVER versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting 15 or less free throws/game over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 152.3 ppg scored.
CBB Home teams where the total is 129.5 or less (NOTRE DAME) - off an upset loss to a conference rival as a favorite against opponent off a road win are 25-6 OVER L/5 seasons for a 81% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average score of 133.1 ppg scored. Play OVER |
|||||||
12-25-22 | Utah State -3 v. Washington State | 82-73 | Win | 100 | 33 h 22 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Stan Sheriff Center - Honolulu, H SMU upset Utah State last time out and Hawaii took out Washington State in tournament action. These two teams play different styles of hoops. Utah State plays a explosive style of offensive basketball while, the Cougars work at a slower pace and a strong defensive mind set. The difference makers today comes via , Utah State's bench that entered this tournament leading the Mountain West and were ranked fifth in the nation in points per game (36.10). Utah State's bench has outscored its opponents 361-185 (36.1 to 18.5) this season as its reserves have accounted for 41.7 percent of USU's. Utah State has had at least two bench players score in double figures in six of its 10 games this season as the Aggies are 6-0 when multiple bench players score in double figures during the campaign. Aggies are 5-0 ATS in their last 5 games following a ATS loss.Aggies are 4-0 ATS in their last 4 Sunday games. Aggies are 8-2 ATS in their last 10 neutral site games.Aggies are 13-6 ATS in their last 19 games vs. a team with a losing straight up record. Cougars are 2-9 ATS in their last 11 neutral site games. Cougars are 1-5 ATS in their last 6 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600. Mouhamed Gueye (Foot) - Questionable () [12/23/2022] - Gueye exited the game before Hawaii with a foot injury, and it is unclear if he will take to the floor vs Utah State . If he plays he will be less than 100/% and puts Wash State at a disadvantage. Utah State to cover |
|||||||
12-25-22 | Iona v. Pepperdine UNDER 152 | 76-66 | Win | 100 | 3 h 42 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB neutral court teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (PEPPERDINE) - a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team are 37-13 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 74% conversion rate. Play UNDER |
|||||||
12-23-22 | Bucknell +19.5 v. Rutgers | 50-85 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 4 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Bucknell ranks 33rd nationally in opponent field-goal percentage (.389), and the Bison are one of only two teams in the nation shooting over 50% while holding opponents under 40%. Its a tall order but Im betting Bucknell keeps it close enough for the cover via top tier offensive and defensive shooting skills. Bison are 4-1 ATS in their last 5 games vs. a team with a winning straight up record. RUTGERS is 4-13 ATS in home games on Friday nights since 1997 Play on Bucknell to cover |
|||||||
12-22-22 | Loyola-Chicago v. Stanford OVER 124 | 62-75 | Win | 100 | 13 h 11 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB teams where the total is 129.5 or less (STANFORD) - poor three point shooting team (32% or less) against a good 3PT defense 32% or better ), in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +6 reb/game) are 28-10 over L/5 seasons for a 74% conversion rate for bettors with 130 ppg scored. CBB Neutral court teams where the total is 129.5 or less (LOYOLA-IL) - in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +6 reb/game) are 38-10 over L/ L/26 seasons witn a combined average of 131.8 ppg scored. Play OVER |
|||||||
12-22-22 | Northern Illinois v. Indiana State UNDER 155.5 | 67-57 | Win | 100 | 7 h 23 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Northern Illinois thanks to their D, has struggled lately, and the coaching staff has said, that their D needs to upgraded and attention must be focused on slowing down opponents out of transition . Thats fits into most teams thoughts when in this type of downward momentum situation. Note: N ILLINOIS is 9-2 UNDER after 3 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 129.2 ppg scored. I expect N.Illinois to implement a more concerted effort on D, which will also limit their output offensively, helping us keep this game to the low side of the number. INDIANA ST is 6-0 UNDER in home games in December games over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 138.1 ppg scored. CBB teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (INDIANA ST) - after playing a game where both teams score 80 points or more, with all five starters returning from last season are 42-11 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 79% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
12-22-22 | Chicago State +13 v. Minnesota | 55-58 | Win | 100 | 3 h 36 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Chicago State to cover |
|||||||
12-21-22 | TCU +1.5 v. Utah | 75-71 | Win | 100 | 1 h 19 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Utah has a huge win against Arizona, but Im betting they are over rated. I know TCU started slowly this season, but with starting guard Damion Baugh back in the lineup the team is 4-0 SU since his return and up trending quickly. UTAH is 1-9 ATS versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making 31% or less of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. UTAH is 1-11 ATS when the line is +3 to -3 over the last 2 seasons.UTAH is 1-9 ATS after 2 straight games giving up 9 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons. TCU is 12-3 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) over the last 2 seasons. Play on TCU ( LATE STEAM) |
|||||||
12-21-22 | Michigan v. North Carolina UNDER 155 | 76-80 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 3 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Spectrum Center - Charlotte, NC Both these teams could really use a win, and Im betting that this will be a grueling affair and both will pay significant attention to playing a strong defensive brand of hoops in transition and for alot of elbow action in the paint. My projections estimate a score closer to 149 which gives us a significant edge on this Totals offering. CBB Neutral court teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points MICH/ (N CAROLINA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (42.5-45%) are 34-8 UNDER L/5 seasons. Play UNDER |
|||||||
12-21-22 | Incarnate Word +14 v. Florida International | 74-79 | Win | 100 | 8 h 53 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Panthers force an average of 17.4 turnovers on opponents and are at their best when able to get out in transition off turnovers, that will be a problem here vs a Cardinals side despite of being young has protected the ball well lately. Florida Inter has lost 4 games in a row and nothing seems to come easily lately and the same Im betting holds true today. Florida Inter is having problems on offense of late scoring 65, 59, and 53 points receptive and according to my power rankings are being over estimated in their ability to cash as this big a DD underdog. FLA INTERNATIONAL is 2-13 ATS L/15 as a favorite of 10 or more points .FLA INTERNATIONAL is 4-19 ATS after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. Play on Incarnate Word to cover |
|||||||
12-21-22 | Northeastern v. Davidson OVER 137 | 73-70 | Win | 100 | 2 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play over |
|||||||
12-20-22 | Montana v. Gonzaga UNDER 147 | 75-85 | Loss | -105 | 16 h 60 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Gonzaga is off a run and gun affair in their last game vs Alabama, with a combined score of 190 points going on the board. Im betting on immediate regression here vs a Montana side that has proven they can play strong defense when need be as is evident by allowing 59 or less points to their opponent in 5 of their L/11 games. GONZAGA is 6-0 UNDER in home games versus sub standard passing teams, averaging 12 or less assists/game over the last 2 season with a combined average of 135.7 ppg scored. CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (MONTANA) - red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making 53% or better of their shots are 44-16 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 73% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
12-20-22 | Illinois-Chicago +16 v. Northwestern | 54-92 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 56 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Following a three-game winning streak, the Flames are flying high and must not be underestimated in their ability to be competitive against a power 5 opponent. IL-CHICAGO is 6-0 ATS as an underdog of 10 or more points over the last 2 seasons. CBB Favorites of 10 to 19.5 points (NORTHWESTERN) - excellent free throw shooting team (73% or better ) against an average free throw shooting team (65-69%), after game - allowing a shooting pct. of 33% or less are 5-26 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 84% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Illinois Chicago to cover |
|||||||
12-19-22 | Stonehill +16.5 v. Bradley | 50-79 | Loss | -105 | 13 h 60 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Stonehill has seen eight different players record double-figure scoring games through its first 12 game and despite of a sub par record have been very competitive only losing by more than this spread to times to power 5 sides, Providence and Connecticut. With that said, Bradley with a better record has played only 1 power 5 team this season, (Arkansas) last time out and lost by 19 points and were also pounded by Utah State by DDs. Looking at their schedule , it seems very likey Bradley is over rated on this line. Advantage Stonehill. BRADLEY is 1-11 ATS after scoring 60 points or less over the last 3 seasons which was the case vs Arkansas last time out. CBB home team (BRADLEY) - good shooting team (45-47.5%) against an average defensive team (42.5-45%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against a horrible rebounding team (6 or less reb/game) are 40-12 ATS L/26 seasons for a 77% conversion rate. CBB Home teams as a favorite or pick (BRADLEY) - good shooting team (45-47.5%) against an average defensive team (42.5-45%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against a horrible rebounding team (6 or less reb/game) are 11-37 /ats L/26 seasons for a go against 77% conversion rate. Play on Stonehill to cover |
|||||||
12-18-22 | Notre Dame -155 v. Georgia | 62-77 | Loss | -155 | 8 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Notre Dame was lethargic in a loss to Marquette last time out. Its extremely important to note Notre Dames HC Coach Brey has used the phrase bounce-back mode alot recently . Notre Dame is 2-0 this season after being defeated with wins over No, 20 Michigan State and Boston U. Dating back to last season, they own a 8-game win streak following a loss. Thus, they haven’t suffered back-to-back losses since Nov. 29 of last year when they lost at Illinois.The Irish are currently leading the country in fouls per game, only committing an average of 11.6. that Im betting will be the difference maker today vs Georgia. On the flip-side GEORGIA is 2-10 ATS vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or more of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. Play on Notre Dame to win SU |
|||||||
12-18-22 | Oakland v. Boise State UNDER 142.5 | 57-77 | Win | 100 | 8 h 52 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Oakland is struggling to score and Im betting on Boise State shutting them down , while they themselves will have offensive regression after a big output last time out. BOISE ST is 8-2 UNDER in all games this season. BOISE ST is 8-1 UNDER after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. Rice is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) in home games off a home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of BOISE ST with a combined average score of 135.1 ppg scored. CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (BOISE ST) - after allowing 55 points or less 2 straight games against opponent after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half. are 31-6 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 84% conversion rate. Play UNDER |
|||||||
12-18-22 | Belmont +5.5 v. Chattanooga | 83-79 | Win | 100 | 5 h 23 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. In their last game over a week ago Belmont lost in OT. Previous to that they had won 5 of 6 games. This is a talented Belmont program is getting more acquainted to a newer lineup as they replaced their 7 top scorers from last season. Note: Alexander is 8-0 ATS off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997. Meanwhile UTChatanooga is on a 6-0 run, but from a matchup perspective using my early season power rankings Belmont despite of alot of inexperience matchup well here.Earl is 4-15 ATS after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997. Play on Belmont to cover |
|||||||
12-17-22 | Clemson -2 v. Richmond | 85-57 | Win | 100 | 1 h 58 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Clemson has exceeded the preseason poll projection nine times in Head Coach Brad Brownell’s 12 full seasons leading the program, including last season. This season they are much better than many expected as team chemistry is a key factor to their effectiveness. Clemson ( Late Steam) |
|||||||
12-17-22 | Toledo v. Marshall UNDER 166 | 85-100 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projected combined score clicks in at 161 giving us top value with this Totals offering. TOLEDO is 18-7 UNDER in road games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season with a combined average of 139 ppg scored. MARSHALL is 13-5 UNDER versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing 14 or less turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 144.8 ppg scored. MARSHALL is 6-0 UNDER ( after playing a game as a road favorite over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 144 ppg scored. CBB Home teams where the total is between 160 and 169.5 points (MARSHALL) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, an excellent offensive team (76 PPG or more) against a poor defensive team (74-76 PPG) are 31-7 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 86% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
12-17-22 | Florida A&M +16.5 v. Louisville | 55-61 | Win | 100 | 6 h 39 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Cardinals enter a new era led by Coach Kenny Payne, who came from the New York Knicks (2020-22) before spending a decade at Kentucky (2010-20) as an assistant and associate head coach and finally notched their first win last time out. Its obvious this version of Louisvilles hoops program has a long road back to respectability and are currently getting this much respect from the linesmakers because of their brand and not the talent on the floor. I know Florida A&M may not inspire many bettors but they are battle tested already taking on five power 5 sides. this season and it looked like it helped as they held their lower tier opponent last time out to under 50 points for a win. Note: McCullum is 10-1 ATS after allowing 50 points or less in all games he has coached McCullum is 14-2 ATS as a road underdog of 12.5 to 18 points as the coach of FLORIDA A&M. LOUISVILLE is 1-9 ATS in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons. CBB Road underdogs of 10 to 19.5 points (FLORIDA A&M) - team - outscored by their opponents by 12+ points/game, after a combined score of 110 points or less are 48-18 ATS L/26 seasons for a 73% conversion rate! Play on Florida A&M to cover |
|||||||
12-17-22 | Bryant +4.5 v. Liberty | 62-82 | Loss | -115 | 4 h 22 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Hall of Fame ClassicBoth teams enter the week ranked in the CollegeInsider.com Mid-Major Top 25 and according to my power rankings more evenly matched than the line might indicate. Bryant was ranked 17h and Liberty No.20.) Thus giving us an edge taking the dog . (Bryant) CBB Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (BRYANT) - in a game involving two good defensive teams (40-42.5%), dominant rebounding team (6 or better reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game) are 39-12 ATS L/5 seasons for a 77% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Bryant |
|||||||
12-16-22 | Chicago State +15.5 v. Southern Illinois | 52-63 | Win | 100 | 15 h 33 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Cougars are 0-9 in road games and that's why we have this over done line to bet into. I know its an ugly away record, but Chicago State behind Jahsean Corbett who scored 25 points in Chicago State's 66-65 loss to the Murray State Racers last time out and up-trending is capable of being competitive here in foreign territory. That was the Cougars 2nd straight loss by 1 point. CHICAGO ST is 14-5 ATS in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. CHICAGO ST is 16-6 ATS versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. S ILLINOIS is 5-15 ATS L/20 as a home favorite of 15.5 to 18 points. CBB Road teams as an underdog or pick (CHICAGO ST) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, on Friday nights are 31-8 ATS L/5 seasons for a 80% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Chicago State to cover |
|||||||
12-16-22 | Missouri State v. Oral Roberts OVER 145 | 77-80 | Win | 100 | 12 h 20 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections make this total closer to 148, which gives us value on the over . Oral Roberts has averaged 97.5 ppg at home this season and play a run and gun all out type of basketball that does not pay much attention to defense in transition. I know Missouri State will try to slow down this game, but its not an easy proposition to implement against this type of no prisoners hoops program. MISSOURI ST is 20-8 OVER versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game with a combined average of 147.1 ppg scored. ORAL ROBERTS is 8-1 OVER in home games versus excellent ball handling teams - committing 12 or less turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 175.4 ppg going on the scoreboard. CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (ORAL ROBERTS) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after being beaten by the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games are 28-7 OVER L/5 seasons for a 80% conversion rate with a combined average of 150.7 ppg scored. Play on the OVER |
|||||||
12-16-22 | Dartmouth +11.5 v. South Florida | 55-59 | Win | 100 | 13 h 47 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. In each of Dartmouth's last five games, a team has ended the first half on a significant run (four times coming from the Big Green). On Tuesday, it was 12-0 Dartmouth. Last Friday at Central Connecticut State, the Big Green ended the first half on a 13-2 run. Against Vermont, it was 13-0 Catamounts to end the first. In the two previous games (both at home), Dartmouth ended the first with a 13-0 run against CSU Bakersfield and 14-0 vs. NVU-Johnson. It may be foreign to some , how I look at runs like this but, from my perspective these long bouts of domination, tell a story of a side that once they get into top condition, will be a hard side to handle . They can dominate, and are rarely dominated. Dartmouth has had issues with complete game performances, but when considering this matchup, their overall talent looks viable enough to compete and get us the cover vs USF. side that struggles with Free Throws and allows opposing 3 point shooters to convert for 37.8% when at home . Gregory is 12-23 ATS in home games after playing a road game as the coach of S FLORIDA.Gregory is 35-50 ATS in all home games as the coach of S FLORIDA. S FLORIDA is 0-6 ATSin home games after a game where they made 53% of their free throws or worse over the last 3 seasons. S FLORIDA is 4-14 ATS in home games versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons McLaughlin is 15-6 ATSin road games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of DARTMOUTH. Play on Dartmouth to cover |
|||||||
12-15-22 | Cal-Irvine +2 v. Santa Clara | 74-86 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 8 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. UC Irvine is ranked top-50 nationally in the following categories: scoring offense (48), scoring margin (17) rebounds per game (21), rebound margin (10), assist per game (36), field-goal percentage defense (41), three-point field goal percentage (7), and three-point field goal percentage defense (50) and must be taken seriously in their ability to come in here at Santa Clara and steal this game. The Anteaters almost stole a game from ranked San Diego State earlier this season, and behind a capable rebounding and physical presence around the rim present problems for all comers including another good rebounding side Santa Clara. Key: The Anteaters don't fire alot of 3-balls, but they are extremely consistent when they do as is evident by a 40.4% rate from beyond the arc , ranking 10th nationally from downtown. SANTA CLARA is 2-9 ATS in December games over the last 2 seasons.SANTA CLARA is 1-8 ATS in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. UC Irvine has won the L/6 meetings in this series including their L/4 visits to Santa Clara. Play on UC Irvine to cover |
|||||||
12-15-22 | Lehigh +23 v. Wisconsin | 56-78 | Win | 100 | 12 h 56 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Wisconsin (8-2, 2-0 B1G) is coming off a pair of physically draining Big Ten wins over No. 13 Maryland (64-59) and Iowa (78-75, OT) and here against. a lower tier side could easily experience a letdown. Reed is 22-11 ATS when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 80%) as the coach of LEHIGH. Reed is 32-21 ATS in road games after playing a home game as the coach of LEHIGH. CBB Underdogs of 10 or more points (LEHIGH) - off an upset loss by 15 or more as a home favorite against opponent off a road win are 58-18 ATS L/25 seasons for a 76% conversion rate. CBB Favorites of 10 or more points (WISCONSIN) - off an upset win as an underdog against opponent off an upset loss by 15 or more as a home favorite are 4-22 ATS L/26 seasons for a 85% conversion rate. Play on Lehigh to cover |
|||||||
12-14-22 | Mississippi State v. Jackson State +22 | 69-59 | Win | 100 | 14 h 60 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. JACKSON ST is 13-4 ATS as an underdog of 10 or more points over the last 2 seasons. CBB road team (MISSISSIPPI ST) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (>=80%) playing a team with a losing record are 4-30 ATS L/5 seasons for a 88% conversion rate. Play on Jackson State to cover +22 |
|||||||
12-14-22 | Drexel +15 v. Seton Hall | 49-66 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 29 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Hall is coming off of a rivalry victory as it retained the Garden State Hardwood Classic trophy with a 45-43 win at Rutgers on Sunday and now Im betting they will be in a emotional letdown situation vs a lower tier non conference opponent making them vulnerable to a slow start or overall lethargic effort. SETON HALL is 4-13 ATS in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. CBB Favorites of 10 or more points (SETON HALL) - after a close win by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 65 points or less 3 straight games are 10-40 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 80% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Drexel to cover |
|||||||
12-14-22 | Ohio v. Florida UNDER 143.5 | 48-82 | Win | 100 | 12 h 55 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Amalie Arena - Tampa, FL My projections make this Total closer to 140 giving us at least one or two full possession edge on this offering from the books. OHIO U is 14-2 UNDER in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing 14 or less turnovers/game over the last 2 season with a combined average of 131.7 ppg scored. OHIO U is 11-2 UNDER in road games after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 136.7 ppg scored. CBB Neutral court teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (FLORIDA/OHIO U) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (45-47.5%) are 82-36 L/5 seasons for a 70% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
12-13-22 | New Orleans v. Boise State UNDER 142 | 50-91 | Win | 100 | 14 h 11 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections make this line closer to 148 which gives us a full two possession value on this offering. Advantage to the under. Boise has allowed 59.3 ppg at home this season, and Im betting New Orleans will be bogged down for much of this game aiding in our under cause. CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (BOISE ST) - after allowing 55 points or less 2 straight games against opponent after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half are 30-6 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 83% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 138.2 ppg scored. Play UNDER |
|||||||
12-13-22 | UMass Lowell v. Rhode Island +2.5 | 75-77 | Win | 100 | 10 h 18 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. I know UMass Lowell is on a big winning streak, but Rhode Island has played more top tier teams than their opposition and deserve respect as home dogs according to my projections. note: This young catalyst brings alot of chemistry to this Rhode Island squad and hes expected to play tonight. Redshirt junior guard Jalen Carey returned for RI team's win over Army Dec. 10 after missing the previous five games with an injury.In 27 minutes off the bench, Carey had a season-high 12 points, six rebounds and a career-best five assists while posting a plus-minus of +8.Carey has been an efficient scorer when available, shooting .520 from the field (13-of-25).CBB road team (UMASS-LOWELL) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (80% or better ) playing a team with a losing record are just 4-30 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 88% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Rhode Island to cover |
|||||||
12-13-22 | VMI +11.5 v. American | 61-69 | Win | 100 | 11 h 22 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. VMI is coming off a thrilling 77-74 win over Radford last Saturday at Cameron Hall where five VMI starters scored in double figures, for their third straight win. Meanwhile, the The Eagles now stand at 7-2 and have not lost a game since Nov. 13 at George Mason and deserve to be favs here , but not by this much as my line is cloder to -7, which according to my projections gives us a excellent opportunity at cashing with the underdog. VMI is 15-4 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons. Brennan is 6-15 ATS versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of AMERICAN. CBB Home favorites of 10 or more points (AMERICAN) - team from a mid-major division 1-A conference against a team from a weak conference, off an upset win as an underdog are 7-31 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 82% conversion rate for bettors. Play on VMI |
|||||||
12-12-22 | Kennesaw State +16.5 v. San Diego State | 54-88 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 56 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Owls' road stretch has been a very successful one, as KSU is 4-2 over the first six games behind a group of 5 returning starters . That includes a road victory at Appalachian State. KSU has also been very efficient from the land of the trey this season, currently ranking 12th in the nation in three-point percentage at 40.4% which makes them viable back door cover choices here vs a ranked side. Take the points |
|||||||
12-11-22 | Mississippi State v. Minnesota +8 | 69-51 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 36 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Minnesota has only faced Mississippi State once in school history, but coming just last year in Starkville, Miss. The Gophers earned an 81-76 win over the Bulldogs on Dec. 5, 2021. Revenge might be on board for the visitors but you dont always get what you want , like Mick Jagger of the Rolling Stones like to say. Even if Miss st gets the win , Im betting it wont come as easily as the linemkaers expect. MISSISSIPPI ST is 0-6 ATS after allowing 65 points or less 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. Jans is 4-13 ATS off a home blowout win by 20 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. CBB road team (MISSISSIPPI ST) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (80% or better) playing a team with a losing record are 3-28 ATS for. go against 90% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Minnesota to cover |
|||||||
12-11-22 | Oklahoma State v. Virginia Tech -2 | 65-70 | Win | 100 | 4 h 5 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. |
|||||||
12-10-22 | Louisiana Tech v. Wyoming OVER 142.5 | 65-92 | Win | 100 | 12 h 29 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Wyoming has average 80.4 ppg in 5 home games this season so far and their opponents LA Tech have average 78.6 ppg on the road. LOUISIANA TECH is 9-2 OVER versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 151.4 ppg scored. LOUISIANA TECH is 9-2 OVER in a road game where the total is 140 to 149.5 over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 153.2 ppg scored in those 11 tilts. WYOMING is 7-0 OVER in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 154.8 ppg scored.WYOMING is 9-1 OVER in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 150.4 ppg scored. CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (WYOMING) - off a home win scoring 85 or more points, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team are 41-11 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 79% conversion rate with the average combined score clicking in at 153.5 ppg . Play OVER |
|||||||
12-10-22 | Drake v. Richmond +2.5 | 52-82 | Win | 100 | 5 h 48 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Richmond is 3-5 this season with four losses coming by three or fewer points. Of note: o Richmond is the only team in D-I with four losses by three or fewer points this season. The Spiders are never out of it. UR is outscoring its opponents by 55 points in the second half this season. Despite of the sub par record the Spiders are a quality side and deserve respect getting points at home. DRAKE is 1-9 ATS in road games after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons CBB road team (DRAKE) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (80% or better) playing a team with a losing record are 3-28 ATS L/5 seasons for a 93% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Richmond to cover |
|||||||
12-10-22 | Radford v. VMI OVER 142 | 74-77 | Win | 100 | 5 h 30 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. VMI a team that has already eclipsed the 100 point plateau 3 times this season will push the pace here forcing Radford to open up to some extent, which will help us eclipse this totals offering. Radford has proved it can pour down points offensively with recent 80 and 86 point outputs in their last 2 trips to the hardwood. RADFORD is 8-1 OVER versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 144.9 ppg scored. RADFORD is 21-8 OVER L/29 when the total is 140 to 149.5. VMI is 14-5 OVER when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 155.9 ppg scored. CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (VMI) - off a home win scoring 85 or more points, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team are 41-11 OVER 26 seasons for a 79% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average score of 153.4 ppg scored. Play OVER |
|||||||
12-10-22 | Buffalo v. Tulane UNDER 157.5 | 63-88 | Win | 100 | 3 h 1 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play UNDER |
|||||||
12-10-22 | Buffalo +7 v. Tulane | 63-88 | Loss | -110 | 2 h 18 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My power rankings suggest this game should be lined a full possession less than this offering giving us value taking points with Buffalo. The Bulls are ninth in the nation in fastbreak points, averaging 19.20 per game. This mark is the best in the MAC. Tulane has issues with these types of teams. BUFFALO is 12-4 ATS in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. BUFFALO is 23-9 ATS L/32 as a neutral court underdog or pick Tulane is 1-7 ATS this season. Play on Buffalo to cover |
|||||||
12-09-22 | Fairleigh Dickinson v. Columbia OVER 152.5 | 76-73 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 14 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Play over |
|||||||
12-09-22 | Grambling State +14.5 v. Vanderbilt | 64-62 | Win | 100 | 10 h 50 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Vanderbilt is off a hard fought emotional 1 point win vs Pitt U last time out and could easily find themselves in a letdown spot here vs a Grambling side that rolls into this game after consecutive conclusive DD wins. I know the wins did not come against Power 5 sides, but earlier this season Grambling did upset Colorado, and deserve respect here on this line offering. Jackson is 17-4 ATS after allowing 30 points or less in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of GRAMBLING. Stackhouse is 6-18 ATS in home games versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 42% or less as the coach of VANDERBILT. VANDERBILT is 17-34 ATS in a home game where the total is 135 to 139.5 since 1997.VANDERBILT is 0-6 ATS in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. CBB Road teams as an underdog or pick (GRAMBLING) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, on Friday nights are 30-8 ATS L/5 seasons for a 79% conversion rate. Play on Grambling to cover |
|||||||
12-08-22 | Iowa State v. Iowa -4 | 56-75 | Win | 100 | 12 h 50 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Iowa will be out looking for redemption tonight at home vs instate rivals Iowa State, after an embarrassing loss to Duke last time out. The Blue Devils size played a big role in frustrating the Hawkeyes, but that wont be the case here vs a smaller group of Cyclones. I know Iowa State D, has played well of late, but is must be noted that the cyclones are just 1-13 ATS L/14 in road games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 37% or less . Otzelberger is 5-16 ATS L/21 in a road game where the total is 140 to 149.5 in all games he has coached. McCaffery is 25-9 ATS in home games after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of IOWA.IOWA is 8-1 ATS in home games in December games over the last 3 seasons. CB BRoad underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (IOWA ST) - an average offensive team (67-74 PPG) against an average defensive team (67-74 PPG), after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more are 14-38 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 73% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Iowa to cover |
|||||||
12-07-22 | CS-Fullerton +14.5 v. USC | 50-64 | Win | 100 | 16 h 37 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. USC is off a hard fought win vs Oregon State last time out and Im betting they will experience a letdown here in this non conference tilt vs a side Im sure they are not considering to be a legitimate threat. CS-FULLERTON is 10-2 ATS versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. CS-FULLERTON is 15-5 ATS versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 42% or less over the last 2 seasons.CS-FULLERTON is 11-2 ATS as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. CS-FULLERTON is 6-0 ATS in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 season USC is 0-6 ATS in home games off a home win against a conference rival over the last 3 seasons which was the case last time out.USC is 1-10 ATS in home games after a conference game over the last 2 seasons. CBB Home favorites of 10 or more points (USC) - after a close win by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 65 points or less 3 straight games are 8-33 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 81% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Fullerton to cover |
|||||||
12-07-22 | Arizona State v. SMU +6.5 | 75-57 | Loss | -110 | 16 h 36 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Mustangs are 3-3 at home this season and 41-8 in the past 49 games at Moody Coliseum. Since Moody Coliseum re-opened for the 2014 American Athletic Conference schedule, SMU has successfully defended home court 126 times in 151 contests. Arizona State goes 9-10 deep , but SMU home court edge gives me confidence in backing the host side getting points. In previous encounters against teams like ASU the Mustangs have been very competitive. SMU in their L/6 games versus teams who average 40 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons have seen the average ppg diff clicking in at -2. SMU L/32 games versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons have seen the average ppg diff clicking in at +1.8. CBB Road teams as an favorite or pick (ARIZONA ST) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (80% or better ) playing a team with a losing record are 2-27 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 93% conversion rate for bettors. Play on SMU to cover |
|||||||
12-07-22 | Alabama State +7 v. North Alabama | 63-71 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 34 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. N.Alabama rallied for a come from behind win vs Morehead state last time out and could easily find themselves in a letdown spot after playing four straight away tilts. ALABAMA ST is 11-0 ATS off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.ALABAMA ST is 8-0 ATS after 3 straight games where they made 40% of their shots or worse over the last 2 seasons.ALABAMA ST is 6-0 ATS in road games after 3 straight games committing 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. Madlock is 10-1 ATS in road games after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. N ALABAMA is 0-8 ATS versus teams who average 6 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. N ALABAMA is 2-17 ATS versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing |
|||||||
12-06-22 | College of Charleston v. Presbyterian +13 | 67-62 | Win | 100 | 14 h 49 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Presbyterian has used the same lineup in their first 9 games, and despite of not notching wins consistently are beginning to show chemistry and cohesion, and deserve respect here vs a superior charlotte side at home getting points. Offensive rebounding will be their key tonight (currently ranked 81st in the nation). PRESBYTERIAN is 14-2 ATS after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread . COLL OF CHARLESTON is 13-29 ATS L/42 after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite. CBB road team (COLL OF CHARLESTON) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (80% or better) playing a team with a losing record are 2-27 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 93% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Presbyterian to cover |
|||||||
12-06-22 | Coppin State v. NC State UNDER 157.5 | 72-94 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 42 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Keatts is 13-5 UNDER when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of NC STATE with a combined average of 139.7 ppg. Dixon is 24-12 UNDER versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting 18 or less free throws/game as the coach of COPPIN ST with a combined average of 139.6 ppg scored. CBB Neutral court teams against the total (NC STATE) - off an upset loss to a conference rival as a favorite, on Tuesday nights are 28-5 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 85% conversion rate with a combined average of 130.5 ppg scored. CBB Neutral court teams against the total (COPPIN ST) - off an upset win as a road underdog, a bad team, winning 20% to 40% of their games on the season are 77-33 L/26 seasons for a 70% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 133.1 ppg scored. Play UNDER |
|||||||
12-06-22 | Illinois +3 v. Texas | 85-78 | Win | 100 | 13 h 37 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Madison Square Garden - New York, NY Illinois is 11-5 SU in their last 16 games versus top-10 teams. Illinois has 10 wins over top-10 teams since 2019-20, second-most in the NCAA behind Baylor (12). Illinois is the winningest team in the Big Ten over the last three seasons, registering a 44-17 mark in league play. In this matchup vs Texas it must be noted that the Illini schedule to date has seen them play tougher competition, and because their battle tested will have in advantage in a game I have lined as a pickem. Texas' strength of schedule is 304th, according to KenPom. Texas is decent at protecting shots from beyond the arc but this Illini side can sink the trey with a high degree of efficiency , with 36.6% of their scoring having come from downtown. Ive watched the Longhorns struggle at times with deep shooters, and despite of their talent may find themselves over whelmed in this spot. Underwood is 44-28 ATS versus excellent ball handling teams - committing 12 or less turnovers/game as the coach of ILLINOIS. TEXAS is 0-6 ATS versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.TEXAS is 4-14 ATS versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. Illinois to cover |
|||||||
12-05-22 | Kent State +16 v. Gonzaga | 66-73 | Win | 100 | 15 h 40 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The Kent State Flashes have won five of their eight games by 20+ points, and are 1-1 on the road and deserve respect here despite of the top tier Gonzaga program they are facing. Meanwhile, the Bulldogs are coming off a heart breaking 64-63 loss against No. 6 Baylor in the first Peacock Classic in Sioux Falls, S.D and could easily find themselves in a letdown spot vs a under rated foe KENT ST is 15-2 ATS vs. good free throw shooting teams - making 72% or more of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. KENT ST is 10-2 ATS versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. KENT ST is 7-0 ATS in non-conference games this season GONZAGA is 22-38 ATS L/60 in home games versus good defensive teams - allowing 64 or less points/game. GONZAGA is 0-6 ATS after playing a game as favorite this season which they were against Baylor last time out. Kent State to cover |
|||||||
12-04-22 | Northwestern v. Michigan State OVER 126.5 | 70-63 | Win | 100 | 9 h 30 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections estimate a Total that should be closer to 132 thus giving us value with an over wager here as we have a more than two possession edge based on my numbers. NORTHWESTERN is 10-0 OVER L/10 off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite with a combined average of 129 ppg scored. MICHIGAN ST is 9-2 OVER after 2 straight games giving up 9 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 146.5 ppg scored. CBB Home teams where the total is 129.5 or less (MICHIGAN ST) - excellent ball handling team - committing 12 or less turnovers/game, after 4 straight games committing 11 or less turnovers are 50-18 OVER L/5 seasons for a 74% conversion rate with a combined average of 132.4 ppg scored. Play OVER |
|||||||
12-04-22 | Monmouth +6.5 v. Manhattan | 76-69 | Win | 100 | 5 h 46 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Monmouth is playing its seventh road game in its first nine contests and have til now been unable to grab a victory. Because of their lack of Ws we are getting an advantageous line to bet into as the matchup is closer than this number would indicate according to my projections and power rankings. MONMOUTH is 9-2 ATS in road games versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. Monmouth is 3-0 SU/ATS L/3 visits here and have eight consecutive victories in this series. Play on MONMOUTH to cover |
|||||||
12-04-22 | George Washington +1.5 v. Radford | 76-86 | Loss | -115 | 5 h 42 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. George Washington is off a big win vs South Carolina last time out and are now forming into a cohesive unit. GW has held New Hampshire and South Carolina to an average of 54.5 points per game and 31.8% shooting over the last two games and their ability to play disciplined transitional ball will Im betting be a key to them covering today vs Radford. The home side did have a big offensive effort last time out, 80-78 win but now a major offensive regression is on board. Note:RADFORD is 2-11 ATS L/13 in home games after scoring 80 points or more. GW has held its opponent below 40% shooting in four of its seven games. CBB Home underdogs vs. the money line (RADFORD) - off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite against opponent off 2 or more consecutive home wins are 39-143 L/26 seasons for a go against 77% conversion rate for bettors. Play on George Washington to cover Play on George Washington to cover |
|||||||
12-03-22 | St. Mary's v. Houston OVER 118.5 | 48-53 | Loss | -110 | 13 h 41 m | Show | |
Dickies Arena - Fort Worth, TX My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Houston can run and gun and play solid D. We know St.Marys will try to grind this game down to halt in order to be competitive, but Houston will dictate the pace and not allow the Gaels to get into a comfort zone forcing them to open up or be completely embarrassed. This Im betting leads to a higher scoring affair than the linesmkaers are expecting. HOUSTON in their L/11 as a neutral court favorite or pick over the last 2 seasons have seen a combined average of 128.4 ppg .HOUSTON is 7-0 OVER in road games after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 40% or less since 1997 with a combined average of 143.5 ppg scored. CBB teams where the total is 129.5 or less (HOUSTON) - after beating the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, top level team, winning 80% or more of their games on the season are 29-6 OVER L/5 seasons for a 83% conversion rate for bettors. Play over |
|||||||
12-03-22 | Indiana v. Rutgers +4 | 48-63 | Win | 100 | 7 h 13 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. I know the Hoosiers are are 7-0 but 5 of those victories have come vs KenPom sub-250 teams. Here against an aggressive and pestering D, getting a victory will not come easily . Not an easy place to play in for visitors. Steve Pikiell as a Home Underdog since 2018 owns a 11-1 ATS mark. RUTGERS is 7-0 ATS in home games versus good shooting teams - making 45% or better of their shots over the last 2 seasons. INDIANA is 2-16 ATS in road games off 3 or more consecutive home wins since 1997. Play on Rutgers to cover |
|||||||
12-03-22 | Tenn-Martin v. North Carolina-Asheville OVER 150.5 | 83-90 | Win | 100 | 6 h 53 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Two teams with capable run and gun offense go head to head here this Saturday. . UNC Ashville has averaged 83.5 ppg in 2 home tilts so far this season while Tenn Martin averages 81 points per game overall while allowing 78 ppg on the road. CBB teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (TENN-MARTIN) - after a home game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a road favorite are 28-4 L/26 seasons for a 88% conversion rate. Play OVER |
|||||||
12-02-22 | Illinois v. Maryland -1 | 66-71 | Win | 100 | 15 h 38 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. This is Illinois first true road game, and despite of playing lights out ball so far this season, are at a disadvantage as visitors tonight as the Terps are just as big and physical as the road side and just as defensively disciplined. It must be noted that Illinois has impressed with their downtown shooting, but Maryland ranks 25th defensively vs the trey and must be respected with the home crowd behind them. ILLINOIS is 4-14 ATS versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 season. MARYLAND is 28-14 ATS L/42 in home games vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 7+ per game. ILLINOIS is 1-8 ATS after a game committing 8 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. Underwood is 8-19 ATS versus very good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 39% or better as the coach of ILLINOIS. CBB Home teams where the line is +3 to -3 (MARYLAND) - after a cover as a double digit favorite, with 2 more starters returning from last year than opponent are 41-13 ATS ATS L/26 seasons for a 76% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Maryland to cover |
|||||||
12-02-22 | Towson v. Long Island +17.5 | 74-64 | Win | 100 | 24 h 21 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. LONG ISLAND is 6-0 ATS in home games after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. CBB road team (TOWSON ST) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a top-level team (80% or better) playing a team with a losing record are 2-26 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 93% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Long Island to cover |
|||||||
12-02-22 | South Dakota State +8 v. Kent State | 68-83 | Loss | -110 | 14 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. S DAKOTA ST is 33-18 ATS versus good defensive teams - allowing 64 or less points/game . CBB Home teams as a favorite or pick (KENT ST) - a good offensive team (74-78 PPG) against an average offensive team (67-74 PPG), after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less are 6-30 ATS L/5 seasons for a go against 83% conversion rate for bettors. South Dakota State to cover |
|||||||
12-01-22 | Youngstown State v. Northern Kentucky OVER 141.5 | 73-77 | Win | 100 | 11 h 57 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My totals projection is 144 on this total thus giving us a full one possession edge on the number. YOUNGSTOWN ST is 9-2 OVER in road games versus teams who are called for 17 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 144.4 ppg scored. YOUNGSTOWN ST is 15-4 OVER L/19 as a road favorite of 6 points or less or pick with s combined average of 144.8 ppg scored. YOUNGSTOWN ST is 9-1 OVER in road games after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 152.6 ppg scored. YOUNGSTOWN ST is 8-1 OVER after a win by 15 points or more over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 149.9 ppg going on the board. Over is 4-0 in Penguins last 4 games following a ATS win.Over is 6-1 in Penguins last 7 overall.Over is 6-1 in Penguins last 7 games following a straight up win.Over is 5-1 in Penguins last 6 road games.Over is 4-1-1 in Penguins last 6 games following a straight up win of more than 20 points. Over is 5-1 in Norse last 6 home games vs. a team with a winning road record. Over is 9-2 in Norse last 11 Thursday games. CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (N KENTUCKY) - off a home win scoring 85 or more points, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team are 39-11 OVER L/26 seasons for a 78% conversion rate for bettors. Play OVER |
|||||||
11-30-22 | New Mexico v. St. Mary's OVER 136 | 69-65 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 17 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. NEW MEXICO is 6-0 OVER in road games when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. 80% or more) over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 165.5 ppg. NEW MEXICO is 9-1 OVER after 2 straight covers as a double digit favorite since 199 with a combined average of 145.3 ppg. scored. NEW MEXICO is 9-1 OVER after 2 straight covers as a double digit favorite since 1997 with a combined average of 140.1 ppg. CBB Road teams against the total (NEW MEXICO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in a non-conference game between two teams from second tier division 1-A conferences are 25-5 OVER L/26 seasons for a 83% conversion rate with a combined average of 147.1 ppg scored. Play over |
|||||||
11-30-22 | St. Joe's v. Pennsylvania -4.5 | 85-80 | Loss | -115 | 14 h 35 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. St.Josephs have lost two straight by DDs, while Penn has won 4 straight and the last 3 by DDs. Im betting on both these trends continuing here today and are chosen side to cover. PENNSYLVANIA is 9-1 ATS in home games versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. PENNSYLVANIA is 6-0 ATS in home games after 3 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. CBB road team vs. the money line (ST JOSEPHS) - poor foul drawing team from last season - attempted |
|||||||
11-29-22 | UC-Santa Barbara +2 v. Duquesne | 61-72 | Loss | -110 | 26 h 44 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155/ATS (UC-SANTA BARBARA) - good 3PT shooting team (36.5% or more ) against a poor 3PT defense (36.5% or better ), after a game where a team made 60% of their shots or better are 32-5 SU/ATS L/26 seasons for a 87% conversion rate for bettors. Play on UC Santa Barbara to cover |
|||||||
11-28-22 | Pittsburgh v. Northwestern OVER 127.5 | 87-58 | Win | 100 | 11 h 10 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Capel III is 24-14 OVER off a home win as the coach of PITTSBURGH with a combined average of 138.6 ppg scored. CBB teams where the total is between 120 and 129.5 points (NORTHWESTERN) - after allowing 65 points or less 3 straight games against opponent after 3 straight wins by 10 points or more are 22-3 L/5 seasons for a 88% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 134.3 ppg scored. teams where the total is between 120 and 129.5 points (PITTSBURGH) - after allowing 65 points or less 3 straight games against opponent after allowing 65 points or less 4 straight games are 38-12 OVER L/5 seasons for a 76% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 130 points going on the board. Play OVER |
|||||||
11-27-22 | Xavier v. Gonzaga UNDER 159.5 | 84-88 | Loss | -105 | 10 h 39 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Veterans Memorial Coliseum - Portland, OR My projections estimate a combined score of no more than 155 points which adds significant value to us taking an under stance here. This estimate is above long term trend factors and gives us cushion room, but is viable with a 2 or more possession edge factor. XAVIER is 22-8 UNDER L/30 in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers with a combined average of 139.1 ppg scored. GONZAGA L/19 games against Big East conference opponents since 1997 have seen a combined average of 146.1 ppg scored. CBB Neutral court teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (Xavier/GONZAGA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (42.5-45%) are 34-6 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 85% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 140.2 ppg scored. Play UNDER |
|||||||
11-27-22 | Canisius +6.5 v. Buffalo | 66-86 | Loss | -110 | 4 h 8 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Canisius has made 10-or more treys in four of the first five games. Dangerous downtown shooting side that deserves respect as underdogs. CBB Home favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (BUFFALO) - poor defensive team (45-47.5%) against a horrible defensive team (47.5% or more ), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO's) are 31-9 ATS L/26 seasons for a 78% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Canisius to cover |
|||||||
11-26-22 | UT-Rio Grande Valley v. Texas UNDER 146 | 54-91 | Win | 100 | 7 h 25 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Leon Black Classic - Gregory Gymnasium - Austin, TX TEXAS is 95-53 UNDER as a favorite of 10 or more points since 1997 with a combined average of 134.9 ppg scored. Under is 43-18 in Longhorns last 61 home games vs. a team with a losing road record. Under is 37-16 in Longhorns last 53 home games vs. a team with a road winning % of less than .400. CBB Neutral court teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (UTRGV) - an excellent offensive team (76 or more PPG) against an excellent defensive team (63 or less PPG), after 2 straight games where both teams score 75 points or more are 24-3 UNDERV L/26 seasons for a 89% conversion rate. CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (TEXAS) - good defensive team from last season - shooting pct defense of 42%, or less hot shooting team - 3 straight games making 47% or better of their shots.91-51 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 65% conversion rate for bettors. Play UNDER |
|||||||
11-26-22 | Utah Valley +10 v. Boise State | 69-87 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 1 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Two of Utah Valley's three losses this season have come in overtime. The Wolverines dropped a 68-65 overtime decision at Wake Forest before falling 73-72 in overtime to Morgan State and they must not be underestimated in their ability to go head to head against a top tier side like Boise State .Madsen is 13-5 ATS versus struggling 3 point shooting teams - making 31% or less of their attempts as the coach of UTAH VALLEY ST.BOISE ST is 0-7 ATS in home games after 2 straight games with 12 or less assists over the last 2 season. CBB team (BOISE ST) - poor shooting team (40-42.5%) against an good defensive team (40-42.5%), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 37% or less are 18-49 L/5 seasons for a go against 73% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Utah Valley to cover Play Utah Valley to cover |
|||||||
11-26-22 | Northeastern v. Princeton -8 | 54-56 | Loss | -115 | 3 h 13 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Princeton is 13th in defensive rebounding percentage and NU is 105th in offensive rebounding percentage and these 2nd chance opportunities will be a difference maker today. Princeton to cover |
|||||||
11-25-22 | Loyola-Chicago v. Harvard +3 | 55-61 | Win | 100 | 20 h 3 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. . Amaker is 18-7 ATS as a home underdog of 3 points or less or pick in all games he has coached since 1997. CBB road team (LOYOLA-IL) - poor foul drawing team from last season - attempted 18 or less free throws/game, team from a second tier division 1-A conference against a team from a mid-major conference are 10-36 L/5 seasons for a go against 78% conversion rate for bettors. CBB road team vs. the money line (LOYOLA-IL) - poor foul drawing team from last season - attempted 18 or less free throws/game, team from a second tier division 1-A conference against a team from a mid-major conference are 8-38 L/5 seasons for a go against 83% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Harvard to cover |
|||||||
11-25-22 | Washington +10.5 v. St. Mary's | 68-64 | Win | 100 | 11 h 3 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. . Wooden Legacy - Anaheim Convention Center - Anaheim, CA The Huskies and Gaels meet for the first time since the 2018 NIT Tournament and eighth time in history, with the Dawgs holding a 6-1 edge. Washington advanced to the final with a 62-57 win over Fresno State on Wednesday while Saint Mary's topped Vanderbilt. The Huskies won the Wooden Legacy in 2014 and last played on Thanksgiving Day in 2015. WASHINGTON is 8-1 ATS versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. WASHINGTON is 13-2 ATS versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting 18 or less free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. WASHINGTON is 6-0 ATS in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. CBB Neutral court teams (ST MARYS-CA) - after going over the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, in November games are 25-62 L/25 seasons with the average ppg diff clicking in at -4.6 . Play on Washington to cover |
|||||||
11-24-22 | Princeton v. Army +10.5 | 74-66 | Win | 100 | 8 h 17 m | Show | |
London Basketball Classic - Copper Box Arena - London, My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. . Play on Army to cover |
|||||||
11-23-22 | UMass Lowell v. Brown UNDER 145.5 | 73-62 | Win | 100 | 8 h 51 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. . CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (UMASS-LOWELL) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, in a game involving two teams that had marginal losing records (40 to 49%) last season are 38-8 UNDER L/25 seasons for a 82% conversion rate for bettors with the combined average of 135.6 ppg scored. Play on the under |
|||||||
11-23-22 | Maine +1 v. Central Connecticut State | 66-58 | Win | 100 | 5 h 31 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. . Maine made easy work of the Columbia Lions last Friday and carried off a 93-70 win. Maine is now 3-1 while Central Connecticut State sits at 0-5. CBB Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MAINE) - good 3PT shooting team (36.5% or better ) against a poor 3PT defense (36.5% or better ), after a game where a team made 60% of their shots or better are 31-5 SU L/26 seasons for a 86% conversion rate. CBB Road teams where the line is +3 to -3 (MAINE) - good 3PT shooting team (36.5% or more ) against a poor 3PT def ense (36.5% or more ), after a game where a team made 60% of their shots or better are 31-5 ATS L/26 seasons for a 86% conversion rate! Play on Maine to cover |
|||||||
11-23-22 | Kansas v. NC State +9 | 80-74 | Win | 100 | 4 h 55 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. NC State 4-0 so far this season behind, head coach Kevin Keatts who has led the Pack to nine wins over ranked opponents in his tenure here and and his team should not be underestimated in their ability compete vs Kansas on a neutral court. NC STATE is 12-3 ATS L/15 as a neutral court underdog of 6.5 to 12 points . CBB Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (NC STATE) - off 2 consecutive home wins by 10 points or more, team that had a losing record last season are 22-7 ATS L/5 seasons for a 76% conversion rate for bettors. CBB team (NC STATE) - first 5 games of the season, after closing out last season with 8+ ATS losses in last 10 games against opponent first 5 games of the season, after closing out last season strong with 7+ wins in last 8 games are 32-9 ATS L/5 seasons for a 78% conversion rate for bettors. Play on NC State to cover |
|||||||
11-22-22 | San Diego State +1 v. Arizona | 70-87 | Loss | -105 | 13 h 13 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. Arizona played a hard fought run and gun Tourney affair with Cincinnati yesterday and could easily be vulnerable to a down effort here today in a letdown spot on short rest. SAN DIEGO ST is 9-1 ATS versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. CBB Neutral court teams (ARIZONA) - excellent defensive team (40% or less) against a good defensive team (40-42.5%), red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making 50% or more of their shots are 20-51 ATS L/26 seasons for a 72% conversion rate! Play on San Diego State to cover |
|||||||
11-22-22 | Bradley +13 v. Auburn | 64-85 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 15 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. The #13 Auburn Tigers will square off against the Bradley Braves at 6 p.m. ET on Tuesday at Hard Rock Hotel Riviera Maya. Pearl is 0-11 ATS after allowing 65 points or less 3 straight games as the coach of AUBURN. CBB team (AUBURN) - up-tempo team averaging from last season 62 or more shots/game, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 37% or less are 6-24 ATS 26 seasons for a go against 80% conversion rate for bettors. Play on Bradley to cover |
|||||||
11-21-22 | Mississippi State v. Marquette +3.5 | 58-55 | Win | 100 | 11 h 2 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. . MISSISSIPPI ST is 0-7 ATS in road games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons Marquette to cover |
|||||||
11-21-22 | Loyola Maryland +13.5 v. Clemson | 41-72 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 9 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. CBB Home favorites of 10 to 19.5 points (CLEMSON) - first 5 games of the season, non-tournament team from last season who won 4+ of their last 5 games, mediocre team from last season that won between 45-55% of their games are 4-30 ATS L/26 seasons for a 88% conversion rate for bettors. Loyola Maryland to cover |
|||||||
11-21-22 | Nevada v. Tulane UNDER 145.5 | 75-66 | Win | 100 | 8 h 24 m | Show | |
My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides offerings from the sports books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation are all taken into consideration as is current form and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. My projections make this line closer to 140 which gives us two full possession advantage. CBB Neutral court teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (TULANE/NEVADA) - in a game involving two teams that had marginal losing records (40 to 49%) last season are 45-7 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 87% conversion rate with. combined average of 133.9 ppg scored. Play UNDER |